Discover more from Indoor Vertical Farming Newsletter®
The Sustainability Paradox: The Use of Single-use Plugs and Its Alternatives in Indoor Vertical Farming
Balancing Efficiency, Profitability, and Environmental Impact in Modern Agritech
Indoor vertical farming presents a transformative solution to diminishing arable lands and the pressures of an ever-growing global population. However, achieving a sustainable model goes beyond the verticality and efficient space utilization of this farming approach.
Indoor Vertical Farming Newsletter® is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
In this exploration, we delve into the current practices of employing single-use plugs and their impact on operational expenses and environmental sustainability. As we critically analyze these conventional methods, we also highlight promising alternatives, such as multi-use plugs and the innovative approach of gelponics, scrutinizing their potential and limitations.
Special thanks to Marcus Comaschi, CEO & Founder of Gyroplant.
The Use Of Single Use Plugs In Indoor Vertical Farming
Indoor vertical farming presents an innovative solution to the limitations of traditional agriculture, with its promise of optimizing space and resources, enabling year-round cultivation, and reducing exposure to pests and diseases. However, the sustainability of this system is critically contingent on the methodologies and materials employed in its operations. A key feature in this setup is the use of single-use plugs and substrate, which play a vital role in seed germination and plant growth, yet also raise significant environmental and economic concerns.
Single-use plugs are commonly used for seed propagation in vertical farms. These small blocks, typically made of peat, coir, or foam, offer optimal conditions for seed germination by maintaining ideal moisture levels and providing a stable environment for root development. This standardization of growing conditions reduces the risk of seedling mortality and facilitates the easy transplantation of sprouts. However, the single-use nature of these plugs has significant implications for waste generation. After each crop cycle, these materials are discarded, contributing to landfill waste and necessitating regular replenishment. Furthermore, peat-based plugs, in particular, have an additional environmental cost associated with peat extraction, which can lead to habitat destruction and carbon emissions.
The use of substrates in vertical farming is equally indispensable and problematic. They provide a medium for plant growth, delivering nutrients and supporting root systems. Unfortunately, many indoor farms use non-renewable resources like rock wool, a clear but environmentally costly choice. Rockwool production involves high energy inputs, and after use, it doesn't decompose readily, resulting in landfill accumulation. Other substrate types, like coir and peat, have environmental issues due to extraction processes, such as deforestation and habitat destruction. Moreover, managing substrate waste can also pose high operational costs for vertical farms.
The supply chain in indoor vertical farming encounters numerous issues, predominantly around logistics—packaging, Sterilization, and regulation compliance present significant cost and operational efficiency challenges. Packaging is necessary to protect products during transportation, but it adds to the cost and environmental footprint of the operation. While critical to maintaining a disease-free environment, Sterilization requires significant resources, including energy, labor, and often chemicals. Additionally, compliance with agriculture and food safety regulations often necessitates implementing complex procedures and regular monitoring, adding to the logistical strain. These aspects are inextricably linked, and disruptions or inefficiencies in one can echo through the entire supply chain, potentially impacting product quality, operational expenses, and environmental sustainability.
“If your business is near the source of your raw materials, logistics, and transportation become less of a concern. However, for those where local natural substrates are not available or in a country that does not have that logistic structure, significant time and financial investments are required for transportation and logistics, inevitably increasing operational expenses and undermining the sustainability credentials indoor farms have” explains Marcus Comaschi, CEO & co-founder of Gyroplant
Using single-use substrates and plugs exacerbates these issues further due to the high maintenance costs they generate to avoid infections. While offering an initially sterile and conducive environment for plant growth, these materials must be carefully managed to prevent disease buildup. In addition, the repeated purchasing, disposal, and replacement of these items significantly increase operational expenditure, and the additional labor required for these tasks can further strain the system. Not only is this financially taxing, but the environmental toll of this waste generation is substantial. While single-use substrates and plugs may offer certain benefits regarding ease of use and crop yield consistency, they also contribute significantly to operational and maintenance costs, affecting indoor vertical farming operations' overall profitability and sustainability.
“Many individuals only consider the initial cost difference and overlook the potential impact it may have on their operational expenses during usage,” adds Marcus. “Additionally, many plugs and substrates commonly used in indoor vertical farming are not environmentally sustainable, contributing to the industry's carbon footprint.”
Leveraging Superstructures & Gelponics
In pursuing more sustainable and cost-effective indoor vertical farming operations, using multi-use plugs presents a compelling alternative to the current single-use counterparts. On the surface, multi-use plugs promise multiple crop cycles from a single plug, potentially reducing material waste and decreasing operational expenses. These advantages, however, should be scrutinized alongside the potential challenges and trade-offs that come with their use.
A key advantage of multi-use plugs is their potential to reduce waste and associated costs. Single-use plugs contribute significantly to landfill waste and require regular replenishment, whereas multi-use plugs, being reusable, could mitigate these problems. In addition, a reduction in waste generation aligns with the overarching goals of sustainability and efficiency, and the decreased need for plug replacement could reduce expenses and logistic complexities tied to the procurement of new plugs for each crop cycle.
However, one of the significant challenges with multi-use plugs is the increased risk of disease and pest infestation. Being fresh and sterile at each use, single-use plugs inherently reduce the likelihood of disease carryover between crop cycles. Multi-use plugs, on the other hand, can act as reservoirs for pathogens and pests if not adequately cleaned and sterilized between uses. This raises the need for rigorous sanitization procedures, which could add complexity and cost to farming operations and potentially offset the cost benefits of plug reuse.
“We decided to utilize Silicone as it can be sterilized effectively to prevent bacterial infections. Moreover, it also enables easy removal of Algae and other unwanted pests typically present in traditional operations,” reassures Marcus.
Moreover, the durability of these multi-use plugs should be carefully considered. To endure multiple crop cycles, these plugs must be made of robust and resistant material. However, durability might compromise biodegradability, a factor essential for environmental sustainability. Therefore, a potential trade-off exists between the longevity of multi-use plugs and their environmental impact, requiring careful material choice and design.
“The Silicone that we use can be recycled or up-cycled after its ten years lifetime," mentions Marcus
The Rise of Gelponics
Gelponics, an advanced form of hydroponics, involves using a hydrogel matrix as the growing medium for plants. This unique approach to soil-less agriculture presents several advantages and limitations, which are essential to consider in the context of sustainable farming solutions.
A notable advantage of gelponics lies in its water and nutrient efficiency. The hydrogel used in gelponics can absorb and retain substantial water and nutrients, releasing them gradually to the plant roots as needed. This results in minimal water and nutrient waste, making gelponics an incredibly efficient system in terms of resource utilization. Moreover, the hydrogel offers a sterile medium, reducing the risk of plant diseases and pests affecting crop productivity and quality.
“Numerous hydrogel types can be utilized effectively, making it a cost-effective solution for users as it is readily available. Additionally, using powder allows for longer storage time, provided that proper precautions are taken,” comments Marcus. “In addition, by preserving the gel from seeds to harvest and eliminating the need for transplantation/handling, you minimize the risk of contamination. As the gel dissolves, it provides further benefits.”
However, the use of a hydrogel matrix also presents particular challenges. One critical concern is the hydrogel's cost and environmental impact. Depending on the type of gel used, it can be relatively expensive to produce and maintain.
Moreover, while the gel medium's sterility is advantageous in disease prevention, it also means that beneficial microorganisms usually found in soil are absent. These microbes play a crucial role in nutrient cycling and promoting plant health. Without them, plants may not receive all the necessary nutrients or require additional chemical inputs to compensate, impacting the system's overall sustainability.
“To compensate for the lack of nutrients in the initial stages, you can always mix nutrients with the gel to give the plants what they require,” mentions Marcus. “Out of the 100 tests that we are currently trialing, most of the growers have seen improvements in the looks of the plants and their ease of use.”